| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
164
   |
Posted - 2012.07.30 19:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
I agree, minus the rage :) |
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
166
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 20:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:CCP should by now be able to state, despite your crocodile tears, whenever you commit a single empire crime you should be kicked in to low then null and never be able to come back, just enough years so you understand actions have consequences and you either take responsibilities or you just go play wow and STFU. lmao
I know right? This quoted statement is so full of stupid it's funny. |
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
166
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 20:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Thor Kerrigan wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:CCP should by now be able to state, despite your crocodile tears, whenever you commit a single empire crime you should be kicked in to low then null and never be able to come back, just enough years so you understand actions have consequences and you either take responsibilities or you just go play wow and STFU. lmao I know right? This quoted statement is so full of stupid it's funny. I'm sure you enjoy your Concord protection and don't even imagine the possibility of neutrals kicking your arse just because you undocked. You're one of those elite pvp dudes right? -I'm laughing at you, and hard. 
Concord offers no protection. NPC faction police do, to a certain extent.
If you get your facts wrong, how can your opinion be valid? |
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
167
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 21:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
Freezehunter wrote:Werst Dendenahzees wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:Eventually it all cones down to: You cannot force someone to log in.
People undock to see if the camp is in place. If it is, they re-dock. Lets say we changed the game so they could not do that.
For example, say warp disruptors and scrams prevented docking, and to balance that it was possible to look out the window of a station to see whats out there. Two changes that balance each other. What would those camped in do? Look and see if its safe. If its not, do not undock. Now the campers just sit doing nothing. Fun Times!
Lets say we just had warp disruptors and scrams prevent docking, but no looking out the window. The camped-in would use a neutral alt to take a look, and not even log in their main unless it was safe.
Eventually it all cones down to: You cannot force someone to log in.
P.S. in real life if you are being shot at you can in fact run through a doorway and close the door. You can always undock and redock before your undock invulnerability wears off. If you are the Captain of an 80 meter frigate IRL and you try to enter a shipyard or dry dock while you are being torpedoed and bombed and shot to hell with artillery, you will not make it in a million years even if you manage to "dock", and you wouldn't even try to in the first place. Should be the same in Eve.
I think the real issue at hand is giving the guy who undocks an alternative to spawning right on top of his would-be aggressor.
If you are given options, then you can say that undocking should be the equivalent of jumping through a stargate. It is actually more dangerous for a covert ship to undock than to jump through a gate because the aggressor knows where your ship spawns.
|
| |
|